GMO Grass: Coming to a Lawn Near You?

Date: May 22, 2014
Source:  Eco Watch
Author:  Charlotte Warren and Ronnie Cummins

Monsanto and Scotts have begun testing the first genetically engineered (GE) grass, intended for both consumer and commercial use.

Scotts Roundup-Ready Kentucky Bluegrass, genetically engineered to withstand massive amounts of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide, is unregulated, will not be labeled “GMO” (genetically modified organisms), and because of the ease with which grass spreads, could in short order contaminate lawns, parks, golf courses and pastures everywhere.

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock
Photo courtesy of Shutterstock

Because Roundup will kill everything except the grass engineered to stand up to it, lawns all over the country will be green, lush—and toxic.

And you won’t know it.

“As these seeds spread and more and more grass takes up that genetic trait, we’ll find organic farmers who want to grass feed their beef, can’t do it because their grass is genetically modified, which is prohibited in organic standards,” said Bill Duesing of the Northeast Organic Farming Association, in an article in CT News Junkie. “GMOs are pollution with a life of its own.”

In July 2011, Scotts Company and Monsanto convinced the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to give the companies a free pass to market Roundup-Ready Kentucky Bluegrass. No testing required.

How did they circumvent the system? GE crops are regulated by the USDA under rules pertaining to plant pests. These rules were created in the 1950s to give the USDA some muscle to constrain the introduction of organisms that would inflict harm to plants. Because genetically modified crops use DNA material derived from natural plant pathogens, they technically qualify as “plant pests.”

Scotts got around this level of restriction because they avoided using plant pests in the development of the Kentucky Bluegrass. Instead, the glyphosate-resistant gene originated from other plants that were not considered pathogens. Furthermore, the gene was fired in with a gene gun, instead of being carried by a plant pest bacterium. By avoiding the use of plant pests in the engineering process, Scotts has also avoided that regulation trigger.

The second mechanism the USDA could have used to regulate GMO grass is the noxious weedprovision under the Plant Protection Act of 2000. It’s well known that bluegrass spreads easily, because its light pollen can be carried for miles on the wind. Inevitably, genetically modified bluegrass will transfer its genes to established conventional bluegrass.

That’s one reason Scotts Roundup-Ready grass is so dangerous—it threatens to contaminate every lawn, park, roadside and field in sight, including the pastures used by organic farmers to graze their cattle. This not only puts organic farmers at risk of losing their certification, but it puts the animals at risk of eating GMO grass. Research shows that GMO grain has a devastating impact on the health of animals raised for slaughter. Will GMO grass also be hazardous to animal health, including cattle raised for meat—and people’s prized horses?

Beyond its ability to spread quickly, beyond its potential impact on organic farmers, even more troubling is the fact that once Scotts Roundup Ready grass hits the market, it will lead to a dramatic increase in the use of Roundup, already the most widely used—and potentially harmful—herbicide in the world.

And much of that Roundup will be lurking in places where kids play.

Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup herbicide has recently been described by researchers as, “the most biologically disruptive chemical in our environment.” It’s been linked to a litany of health disorders and diseases including Parkinson’s, cancer and autism.

Studies have revealed a connection between the use of glyphosate and birth defects in frog and chicken embryos. A more recent study shows that the toxic herbicide was found in the breast milk of American women.

This month, employees of Scotts begin testing the new product at their homes. Scotts’ CEO toldshareholders his goal is to have the GMO ready for commercial applications in 2015, and on the consumer market in 2016.

Scotts, which is Monsanto’s exclusive agent for the marketing and distribution of consumer Roundup, has much to gain by releasing its frankengrass into the marketplace. According to The Columbus Dispatch, CEO Hagedorn in January told shareholders the market opportunity for Roundup-Ready Bluegrass is substantial. “If you look at the grass-seed category, it’s probably significantly north of $500 million and probably less than $1 billion.”

The company is determined to protect its projected revenue. When Connecticut came close to passing a statewide ban on GMO grass, Hagedorn reportedly sent a letter to Gov. Dannel Malloy (D-CT) stating that any renewed effort to ban or place a moratorium on the new seed could result in Hagedorn questioning “whether continuing to invest in Connecticut is in the best long-term interests of my company and its stockholders.”

Monsanto and Scotts are both members of the Grocery Manufacturers Association, which has spent millions to defeat GMO labeling laws and bans, and plans to sue Vermont to overturn itsrecently passed law requiring mandatory labeling of foods containing GMOs. The Organic Consumers Association has called for a boycott of all products marketed by members of the Grocery Manufacturers Association.

We also urge consumers everywhere to contact Hagedorn and other executives at Scotts to inform them that they will boycott all Scotts products unless the company drops plans to market its Roundup-Ready Kentucky Bluegrass. You can take action here.

Charlotte Warren is a media and communications consultant to the Organic Consumers Association.

Ronnie Cummins is the national director for the Organic Consumers Association.



Scotts CEO Warns Malloy About Reviving GMO Seed Ban Bill

Date:  April 17, 2014
Author:  Gregory B. Hladky

A bill to ban genetically modified grass seed and sod from Connecticut’s lawns was uprooted and dumped on the legislative mulch pile by the House last week, but that wasn’t good enough for the head of Scotts Miracle-Gro.

The chairman of that company wrote Gov. Dannel Malloy Thursday warning that any revival of the ban or any moratorium on the new grass seed could lead Scotts to reconsider its investments in Connecticut.

Scotts is creating a grass seed using genetically modified organism (GMO) technology. This new form of lawn grass could survive being sprayed with Monsanto’s popular herbicide, Roundup. That would allow homeowners to use Roundup to kill every weed in their yard without hurting the grass.

Environmentalists are worried that could result in a huge boost in pesticide and herbicide use, which could create more pollution, and that the new type of grass could spread and endangering Connecticut’s organic farms. They fear Scotts’ new GMO grass seed could be available soon and wanted the ban in place now, but House lawmakers rejected that plan on a bipartisan vote.

Jim Hagedorn is chairman and chief executive officer of Scotts, and he wrote to Gov. Dannel Malloy Thursday because he is “dismayed that so many uninformed comments have been made about our technology.”

Hagedorn said the new grass seed is intended to need “less mowing, less fertilizer, fewer pesticides and less water.” He said the GMO grass “would provide unquestionable environmental benefits.” Hagedorn said the seed is scheduled to be tested on a few lawns in Ohio this year, and said it could be “one of the most important turf seed innovations ever brought to the marketplace…”

His problem is that new studies have raised serious questions about the long-term environmental impacts of other types of GMO seeds and crops, including increased resistance of weeds and insect pests to the herbicides and pesticides used in tandem with GMO technology.

There are growing concerns that GMO crops are having unintended consequences, such as contributing to the decline of the monarch butterfly and bee colony collapse disorder.

Scott’s CEO wants to have the University of Connecticut join with the other universities that Scotts has recruited to study the new grass seed. He also asked Malloy “to reject any attempt to enact a moratorium banning our products, even temporarily.”

Hagedorn also warned that any renewed effort to have Connecticut ban or place a moratorium on the new seed could lead him to question “whether continuing to invest in  Connecticut is in the best long-term interests of my company and its stockholders.”

Scotts now has one of its main manufacturing plants in this state and employs about 200 people here.

Hagedorn may well have reason to be worried about a revival of the GMO seed ban. The Senate’s top Democrat, Donald Williams Jr. of Brooklyn, says he’s thinking about ways to breathe some legislative life back into that proposal.